Employee Retention Statistics 2026: 16 Key Numbers

U.S. voluntary turnover held at 13% in 2025, according to Mercer's survey of 2,617 organizations - down sharply from 24.7% in 2022 but still costing businesses roughly $1 trillion annually, per Gallup. Replacing a single employee runs 50% to 200% of their annual salary, per SHRM. The Work Institute found 75% of those departures were preventable, and Gallup confirms 71% of voluntary exits trace back to poor management rather than pay. These 16 statistics map the true scale of the retention problem and the specific drivers employers have the most power to fix.

Retention has become the defining HR challenge of the mid-2020s. The frenzy of the Great Resignation has cooled, but organizations still bleed talent at rates that carry serious financial consequences. Understanding exactly why people leave - and what keeps them - matters more now than it did when everyone was quitting simply for a raise.

This post covers turnover rates, replacement costs, the leading reasons employees leave, the role of burnout and busywork, and how career development changes the equation. It draws on data from BLS, Mercer, SHRM, Gallup, LinkedIn, Work Institute, and Eagle Hill. Below are the 16 statistics that define employee retention in 2026.

1. U.S. voluntary turnover averaged 13% in 2025

Mercer's 2025 US Turnover Survey of 2,617 organizations found the national voluntary turnover rate averaged 13% - a sharp drop from 24.7% in 2022 and 17.3% in 2023. The cooling reflects a tighter job market and fewer outside offers, not a surge in employee satisfaction. Industry variation is wide: retail and wholesale run at 26.7%, hospitality approaches 75%, while insurance holds at 8.2%. The national average masks a landscape where some sectors still face near-constant churn. For any business operating above the 13% benchmark, turnover is already costing more than peers. The rate also underscores that even a "calm" labor market still sees one in eight workers changing employers every year.

Source: Mercer - Results of the 2025 US Turnover Surveys

2. Replacing an employee costs 50% to 200% of their annual salary

SHRM and Gallup both place the total replacement cost at 50% to 200% of a departing employee's annual salary. For a mid-level worker earning $80,000, that means roughly $40,000 to $160,000 in recruiting fees, interview time, onboarding, and the 6-to-12 months before a replacement reaches full productivity. A manager at $150,000 can cost $300,000 to replace. These are not edge-case estimates: SHRM's methodology captures direct costs like job boards and agency fees alongside soft costs like lost institutional knowledge and team disruption. The range is wide because complexity varies by role, but even the conservative end reshapes how employers should think about retention investments. Spending $5,000 to fix a problem that would otherwise cost $40,000 is straightforward math.

Source: SHRM - Turnover Cost Calculation Spreadsheet

3. Voluntary turnover costs U.S. businesses $1 trillion a year

Gallup estimates that voluntary turnover alone costs U.S. employers approximately $1 trillion annually. The figure aggregates recruiting, onboarding, productivity ramp-up, and the morale costs absorbed by the colleagues left behind. It works out to a staggering per-company burden across the economy. Gallup reaches the number by multiplying replacement costs across the national workforce - an approach that makes the scale concrete without exaggerating any single firm's exposure. For a 500-person company at 13% turnover, roughly 65 departures a year at an average replacement cost of $40,000 each equals $2.6 million annually in direct turnover expense. The trillion-dollar total explains why retention has moved from an HR concern to a board-level priority.

Source: Gallup - State of the Global Workplace 2025 Report

4. 75% of employee departures are preventable

The Work Institute's 2025 Retention Report, drawn from nearly 100,000 exit interviews, found that 75% of employee departures were preventable. The research identifies career stagnation, weak management support, poor communication, and workload problems as the leading causes - all of which fall within an employer's control. That 75% figure is the most actionable number in retention research: it means three out of four exits did not have to happen. The Work Institute has tracked this metric for more than a decade, and it has remained consistently high, suggesting the same fixable problems drive turnover year after year. Preventable exits are expensive precisely because the cost is discretionary. Unlike a market-wide wage shock, these losses can be reduced through deliberate management practices and operational changes.

Source: Work Institute - 2025 Retention Report

5. Lack of career development drives turnover for 13 consecutive years

The Work Institute's longitudinal analysis found that lack of career development has been the single most common reason for employee turnover for 13 straight years. Workers leave when they see no path forward - not primarily for a bigger paycheck elsewhere, but because the current role offers no growth. The finding challenges the instinct to respond to turnover spikes with across-the-board raises. Pay matters, but it does not address the underlying reason most people actually leave. Career development covers promotions, skill-building, mentorship, lateral moves, and clear advancement timelines. Organizations that build those structures into day-to-day management outperform those that treat them as an occasional HR initiative. Thirteen years of consistent data is a strong signal: fix the growth path, or watch the door revolve.

Source: Work Institute - Common Causes of Employee Turnover

6. 71% of voluntary exits trace back to poor management

Gallup research attributes 71% of voluntary exits to poor management rather than to pay or external offers. Managers control the day-to-day factors that most affect engagement: workload distribution, feedback quality, career conversations, and psychological safety. When those go wrong, pay raises rarely reverse the decision to leave. Gallup's framework positions managers as the single highest-leverage variable in retention. This aligns with a separate Gallup finding that 70% of the variance in team engagement is explained by the manager alone. The implication for HR is that retention programs targeting only compensation or benefits will miss the majority of preventable exits. Building manager capability - specifically the skills to develop, support, and communicate with direct reports - is the highest-return retention investment available.

Source: Gallup - State of the Global Workplace 2025 Report

7. Global employee engagement fell to 21%, costing $9.6 trillion

Global employee engagement dropped from 23% to 21% in 2025, according to Gallup - the second consecutive annual decline and the lowest level since 2020. The economic cost of disengagement reached $9.6 trillion in lost productivity globally, equivalent to nearly 9% of global GDP. In the U.S. specifically, disengaged employees cost employers approximately $1.9 trillion annually. A single disengaged employee costs an organization roughly 34% of their annual salary, per Gallup's methodology. The engagement decline is notable because it follows years of post-pandemic recovery gains. The reversal points to structural problems - manager burnout, unclear expectations, and reduced career development investment - that pay increases alone will not address. Our breakdown of employee engagement statistics covers the full scope of this trend.

Source: Gallup - State of the Global Workplace 2025 Report

8. 51% of U.S. workers are actively watching for new jobs

Gallup found that 51% of U.S. employees are actively watching for or seeking new job opportunities - the highest self-reported turnover risk since 2015. This measure of latent intent matters because it leads actual departures: workers who are watching for new roles are far more susceptible to an attractive offer than those who are not. The figure does not mean half the workforce will quit tomorrow, but it signals that a large share of the workforce is not committed enough to stop looking. That posture compounds: one departure can trigger others as remaining colleagues reassess their own situations. For HR and operations teams, a 51% watch-rate means the pipeline of potential exits is wide, and the margin for poor management decisions or operational frustrations is thin.

Source: Gallup - State of the Global Workplace 2025 Report

9. SHRM's cost per hire reaches $5,475 for non-executive roles

SHRM's 2025 benchmarking report sets the average cost per hire at $5,475 for non-executive positions and $35,879 for executive roles - an increase of 113% for executive hiring since 2017. Cost per hire covers job postings, recruiter time, background checks, and interviewing overhead, but excludes the productivity ramp-up costs that compound the total. The executive figure reflects the growing complexity of senior searches and rising recruiter compensation. For a company losing 50 non-executive employees a year, that $5,475 average translates to $273,750 in direct recruiting spend before a single day of training begins. Small businesses absorb these costs without specialist HR teams, making each departure disproportionately disruptive. These numbers feed directly into the human resources statistics picture that HR professionals need to make the case for retention investment.

Source: SHRM - 2025 Benchmarking Reports

10. Burned-out employees are nearly 3x more likely to leave

Eagle Hill Consulting's November 2025 Workforce Burnout Survey found that 55% of the U.S. workforce is currently experiencing burnout. Burned-out workers are nearly three times more likely to say they plan to leave their employer in the coming year (45% versus 16% for those who are not burned out). Burnout does not arise from hard work alone; it is driven by a specific kind of friction: 61% of employees report taking on duties outside their original job descriptions, and 53% have absorbed responsibilities from colleagues who already left. That cycle - people leave, remaining staff absorb the work, more people burn out and leave - is self-reinforcing. Reducing the administrative and manual workload that sits outside employees' core roles is a direct intervention in the burnout-to-turnover chain.

Source: Eagle Hill Consulting - Workforce Burnout Survey 2025

11. Engagement issues and work-life imbalance account for 69% of exits

Gallup's exit data shows that "engagement and culture" problems combined with "well-being and work-life balance" concerns account for 69% of the reasons employees leave - far outpacing pure pay dissatisfaction. Nearly half of voluntary leavers report that no manager or leader proactively discussed their job satisfaction, performance, or future in the three months before departure. That finding points to a specific, fixable failure: organizations lose people not because they cannot solve the problem, but because they never learned one existed. Regular, structured check-ins between managers and direct reports cut this figure reliably. The 69% is a useful reframing for boards and executives who assume turnover is a compensation problem: most exits are a management-conversation problem that no pay increase will retroactively fix.

Source: Gallup - State of the Global Workplace 2025 Report

12. 93% of workers would stay longer if employers invest in development

LinkedIn's 2025 Workplace Learning Report found that 93% of employees say they would be more likely to stay with an organization that invests in their career development. Only 36% of organizations reach what LinkedIn calls "career development champion" status with programs that generate measurable business results. An additional 33% have no development initiatives at all. The gap between what workers need to stay and what employers provide is stark. Only 15% of employees report their manager helped them build a career plan in the past six months, down 5 percentage points from 2024. The same report found that 59% of CHROs now identify development as the employee experience element their organization struggles with most. Investment does not require large budgets: structured career conversations, visible internal mobility, and mentorship programs consistently outperform sporadic training spend.

Source: LinkedIn - 2025 Workplace Learning Report

13. One in four U.S. workers lacks any career advancement opportunity

Gallup's polling found that one in four American employees reports having no opportunity for career advancement at their current employer. For the segment of the workforce most concerned with growth - typically high performers - that figure is disqualifying. Workers who see no path forward do not wait for exit surveys; they start job searches while still employed. Gallup's related research found that companies with high retention rates experience 22% higher overall profitability compared to high-turnover peers. The causal link between advancement opportunity and financial performance is well-established: the employees most likely to leave over stagnation are often the ones most capable of finding a better role elsewhere. Losing high performers at disproportionate rates degrades organizational capability faster than raw turnover numbers suggest.

Source: Gallup - One in Four U.S. Employees Lack Advancement Opportunities

14. New hires take 6 to 12 months to reach full productivity

Research consistently places the time-to-full-productivity window for new hires at 6 to 12 months, with organizations reporting that structured onboarding programs compress this to 4 to 6 months. A failed hire in the first year costs approximately $14,900 in recruiting, onboarding, training, lost output, and re-hiring expenses, with specialized roles exceeding $50,000. Nearly 30% of new hires in the U.S. depart within their first 90 days. That 90-day window is critical: organizations that invest in consistent, paperwork-light onboarding with clear expectations retain new hires at significantly higher rates than those with ad-hoc processes. Every administrative friction point during onboarding - unclear paperwork, missing equipment, disorganized documentation - sends an early signal about whether the role will match expectations.

Source: AIHR - Employee Onboarding Statistics 2026

15. Office workers lose 636 hours a year to repetitive administrative tasks

Office workers lose an average of 636.6 hours per year to administrative or repetitive tasks, roughly one-third of the working year, according to workplace productivity research. HR professionals bear a particularly heavy load: 73.2% of their working hours go to tedious administrative tasks. When employees spend a third of their time on low-value busywork rather than the work they were hired to do, frustration compounds. This links directly to the burnout and retention data: 61% of employees report absorbing duties outside their job description, and administrative overflow is a primary driver. The connection between manual paperwork, document handling, and employee satisfaction is direct. Teams that reduce unnecessary administrative friction - particularly in document-heavy roles - report lower burnout and stronger retention outcomes. Remote work statistics show that distributed teams face particular challenges here, since document handoffs that happen naturally in person require explicit digital workflows when staff are spread across locations.

Source: Electroiq - Productivity in the Workplace Statistics

16. SHRM finds engagement and culture drive 42% of turnover intent

SHRM's 2025 State of the Workplace report found that employee experience and engagement factors account for 42% of turnover intent - the single largest category ahead of compensation or benefits. Only 20% of organizations currently track quality-of-hire, meaning most employers spend heavily on recruiting without measuring whether new hires succeed or stay. SHRM's benchmarking also shows that cost-per-hire is rising while measurement practices lag: organizations are paying more to replace people they could not retain, without the data infrastructure to understand why. Addressing engagement systematically - through regular manager check-ins, clear development pathways, and administrative load reduction - consistently reduces this 42% driver. Culture and experience are not soft variables; they carry the largest measurable weight in whether people stay or start looking.

Source: SHRM - 2025 State of the Workplace

What These Numbers Reveal About Employee Retention in 2026

The data converge on a counterintuitive finding: turnover is not mainly a compensation problem. Gallup attributes 71% of exits to poor management. Work Institute finds 75% of departures preventable. LinkedIn reports 93% of workers would stay for better development. Pay matters, but it is rarely the primary lever. Organizations that respond to turnover spikes with blanket raises often fix the wrong problem and see the same employees leave six months later anyway.

The second pattern running through the data is the administrative burden link. Burned-out employees are three times more likely to leave, and burnout is directly tied to workload creep outside core job descriptions. Workers absorb the manual tasks of colleagues who left before them - filling out forms, handling paper documents, managing disconnected workflows - until the weight tips them toward the exit. This means reducing unnecessary administrative friction is not just an efficiency play; it is a retention intervention. The connection is clearest in document-heavy roles, where time spent on paper-based processes is time taken from meaningful work.

The third pattern is the speed of compounding costs. At $40,000 to $160,000 per replacement, a 13% annual turnover rate is not a slow drain - it is a significant recurring expense. The 6-to-12-month ramp-up window means a departure's productivity cost extends well past the recruiting and onboarding invoice. Organizations that treat retention as a soft HR goal rather than a hard financial metric consistently underinvest in the fixes that would pay for themselves fastest.

Retention is a financial outcome. The organizations that treat it that way - measuring engagement, reducing busywork, building manager capability - capture both the cost savings and the performance advantage of a stable, focused workforce.

Reduce Busywork and Keep the People You Hired

Manual document handling sits at the intersection of every retention problem described above. New hire onboarding stalls when paperwork is disorganized. Managers lose hours to filing and re-filing instead of having career conversations. Field staff spend their afternoons retyping receipts and contracts instead of doing the work that drew them to the role. Each of these frictions is small in isolation. Accumulated across a team, they become the administrative drag that drives burnout, disengagement, and eventually departure.

Filewise turns any iPhone into a fast, private document scanner. Scan contracts, ID documents, onboarding forms, and receipts into sharp, multi-page PDFs in seconds. On-device OCR makes every scan searchable without uploading files to a third-party server. No ads, no account required, no subscription traps. For HR teams, field managers, and small-business owners, it removes the paper friction that sits underneath too many administrative tasks.

Join the Filewise waitlist and start cutting the document busywork that drains employee time and focus.

Filewise is launching soon - the private, on-device PDF scanner for iPhone with no ads and no subscription traps.

Join the Filewise Waitlist

Private, on-device scanning · No account required · Launching soon on iOS

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average employee turnover rate in the U.S. in 2025?

Mercer's 2025 US Turnover Survey of 2,617 organizations found the national voluntary turnover rate averaged 13%, down sharply from 24.7% in 2022 and 17.3% in 2023. Industry rates vary widely, from 8.2% in insurance to roughly 75% in hospitality, so the national average is most useful as a benchmark for whether a specific organization is above or below market.

How much does it cost to replace an employee?

SHRM and Gallup both estimate replacement costs at 50% to 200% of the departing employee's annual salary. SHRM's 2025 benchmarking puts average cost per hire at $5,475 for non-executive roles, but that figure excludes productivity ramp-up costs of 6 to 12 months, which drive the total much higher. A failed hire in the first year costs roughly $14,900 on average, and more for specialized positions.

Why do most employees quit their jobs?

Gallup attributes 71% of voluntary exits to poor management rather than pay. The Work Institute's 2025 Retention Report found lack of career development has been the top reason for departure for 13 consecutive years. Gallup also found that 69% of exits trace to engagement, culture, and work-life balance problems. Nearly half of leavers had no career conversation with a manager in the three months before leaving.

How does administrative burden affect employee retention?

Eagle Hill Consulting found that 61% of employees have absorbed duties outside their original job descriptions, contributing to the 55% burnout rate reported in their 2025 survey. Burned-out employees are nearly three times more likely to plan to leave. Office workers lose 636 hours a year to repetitive tasks, and reducing that administrative load is a direct intervention in the burnout-to-turnover cycle that compounds when staff departures push remaining employees to absorb even more manual work.